Yes, projects that either benefits me or that I want to support, only if it was hosted on a 3rd party website/service though.
Maybe we could make a thread where people post their own projects / contributions they're ready to make together with their crowdsource account id/link?
Does anyone know if the various crowdsourcing sites supports automatically refunding people's money if the incentive is not met, or if they have any policies regarding quality or scams, such as if promises by the founder are not delivered?
Regarding OTClient that's been brought up several times already here, the elephant in the room that no one will talk about, and maybe are not aware of, is that Diath who controls the OTClient repo nowadays is holding the repo back by gatekeeping it, he incorrectly marks issues with other issues that aren't related, refuses to change these marks, he doesn't take feedback, he acts as toxic as some of the most toxic members of this forum, rejects PR's based on nothing or legacy ideas from 2012 like "lets keep OTClient c++11 forever! (why? I don't know, I don't need to explain myself!)" and "we should NEVER introduce cryptography because it's 'against open source', however keep stats.lua that sends all your information to an external server is totally fine, leave that module alone, nothing anti-open source about preinstalled malware!".
Both Diath and Iryont has been gatekeeping the OTClient repo / blocking PR's for years, this is why it died imo, and why OTLand tried to start their own repo, but which also died out.
What I think we need to resurrect OTClient is more coordination and leadership, discussing what direction we want to go in, what we want to prioritize fixing, prioritize changing, if we should try redesigning certain things etc, and what we should do about edubart's repo, if we should try to take it back or use OTLand's repo or what.
Less censorship, more constructive discussion without arguing about who's stupid and mocking each other like a bunch of teenagers, and hype for new features and solutions, crowdsourcing would help as well, I tried to do this before by offering to publish solutions to OTClient for the price I paid for a freelancer to solve it, but it probably didn't receive enough attention from simply being a github issue, and eventually a guy in mehah's repo fixed it for free, which is sort of nice of him, but it kinda ruins the whole point, I only spent my time posting that bug in the first place with the idea of crowdsourcing bug fixes, if someone suddenly does it for free I'll have to stop posting bugs that I've fixed since I'm just spending money on solutions that nobody will pay me back for, so it's just a loss of money of me, not in terms of revenue but in terms of already made costs.