The illuminati
Look, everyday somewhere or another, I hear the wordilluminati. Most commonly slated in society. But I propose a question; how do you know they are corrupt, evil and greed focused? You don’t! Every identifiable impression of knowledge you have read or heard about the said organisation is inscribed or preached by an individual with a point of view. People these days are more commonly misinterpreting opinion as fact and let alone the actual fact that this so called “illuminati” exists! Now, ‘history’ and “evidence” dictates that ‘they’ are apparently a satanic “cult” that comprise of members of a so-called “new world order” under the symbol of the “all seeing eye”.
Now, let’s analyse the common knowledge of its existence. The word illuminati, meaning enlightened is interpreted as all knowing (at least to some extent anyway). That being said, surely it is only fitting that the symbol that is used to represent this organisation is an “all seeing eye”, no? Why not? It seems rather appropriate to me.
Okay, let’s move on to its aims; claimed by so called societal representatives with societies best interests at heart, the illuminati is apparently attempting to withhold information from the remaining members of society under their discretion. Why do you think that they would do this (if they are) and how? Well, let me answer this in a vague manner (since nothing concrete is known about this subject)
If ‘they’ (if ‘they’ are a ‘they’) are prohibiting us from knowing about something, surely this infers that it is; on a global scale, in society’s best interest. For example, knowing how ‘society’ acts and behavioural predictions being so risk apparent, it would probably be most beneficial if we didn’t know. The how, links in with this so-called “power abuse” and “wealth” “they” apparently have. Since, money is the world’s medium for growth, and everyone being as corruptible as they are in terms of greed (man always wants more) they can “invest” “their” “wealth” and “power” to counter the “risk” of society finding out about said “truth” to prevent a possible negative consequence. How is this acting against society’s interest?
I have found through studies into society’s views across the subject through the internet, spoken word and through sources of history, that nothing actually dictates this organisation (if it exists, and I’m not going to be in denial of its existance, I’m just “sitting on the fence”) that this organisation is ‘bad’ for society. The only representation of this organisation is through personal opinions, and therefore subjective to anyone and everyone who becomes in contact with any information regarding this issue. Fact is, if this organisation actually exists, then it would have been established on good intentions to protect society from itself, and that principle would be its main clause!
Okay, there could be the possibility that I am wrong on almost every statement and argument I put forward in their favour (again, if ‘they’ are a ‘they’) and you could be right! Because, since you’re reading this, you surely have your own subjective interpretation on this subject for you to be interested and I would actually like to hear them, my email will be available at the end. As to this organisation being a negative force to society, well there are several possibilities for this.
1.) To prevent a free spirited, incorruptible individual from coming into power of some extent.
2.) To have some bearing on influencing society when needed
3.) To recreate a new world, under their discretion
Etc
Etc
Now, this is all very well and possible but I just somehow disbelieve this; something deems to be false about these judgements and you are entirely in control of your own free will, and can choose which side of the fence to sit on. But I ask for you just to look at both sides when making an argument to test if this opinion could be regarded as a fact in your own mind before spreading the word to others. Because we all know that in this reality, nothing can every be 100% certified to be true.
Yet, I seriously agree that being mislead and misinformed of certain issues may seem against our interest in terms of free will and rights, but I ask you this also. For those rights to be implemented, surely this “organisation” would of hindered it’s proposal if it was deemed to be against the “organisation’s” interest and if “society” claims that the illuminati control the world’s most dominant leaders, then surely something like this would never be passed?
Okay, I now hear all you conspirers shouting that it is just a front and really they are making us believe we have control when we don’t. Well, there are two points I am getting to here. One, if this is true, then society has benefited regardless, since the main inference of society is through our beliefs and perception of the world, therefore being influenced into believing we have some freedoms opposed to believing we have none is beneficial to us anyway. My second point is that if this is false, and we are not being influenced and deceived, then this is also beneficial to us, there is no falsifiability within this and therefore society benefits either way!
Now I hear you all saying, then why do “they” need to interfere if we benefit anyway?
Well, there isn’t a strict simple answer for this. A lot can be interpreted from their apparent actions of disclosing information to us, as a society under their discretion. For one, it seems “they”; if real, are really protecting the future of mankind by slowing growth of our race, before we outpace ourselves and get lost in our “sinful” ways. Furthermore, how do we know the idea of the illuminati wasn’t a front altogether? To intestinally hinder those efforts from other “left winged” extremists from doing the same thing? At least this way, it can be regulated and if one global “order” is already doing it, someone else wont!
Yes! There is much evidence supporting links with Templars and religion being used as a medium to enforce rules onto a society for so-called “order” but with that being said, society benefits! If a country gave all its power to its people, it would collapse within itself due to people not truly knowing what is needed for everyone as a whole and the corruption within our own minds tempting us to only think about us directly as a primary benefactor and the rest of society the secondary benefactor! Therefore the “collection” of some individuals that influence the world around us to keep us from destroying ourselves, surely is a good move and shouldn’t be hindered in anyway, shape or form and we should greet any opportunity to embrace this.
I am interested in hearing your thoughts, email me at [email protected]
