OTClient Skill Level bug

[Pifafa]

Hello everyone, when we reach level 638 to 639 we have the problem.


So it looks like this:


I don't know what to do, my client otclient, I tried a solution already made here but it didn't work.
The problem is just passing the 4294967296 of experience that nothing else is a maximum of 32 bits.

 

[Tenzhiro]

C++ - Explain Formula level

Greetings OTLanders can someone explain in math this formula and how it works? static uint64_t getExpForLevel(int32_t level) { int64_t x = level; return ((50*x/3 - 100)*x + 850/3)*x - 200; } And how to edit it to reach the maximum level to 1300 for example...

otland.net

 

[Pifafa]

C++ - Explain Formula level

Greetings OTLanders can someone explain in math this formula and how it works? static uint64_t getExpForLevel(int32_t level) { int64_t x = level; return ((50*x/3 - 100)*x + 850/3)*x - 200; } And how to edit it to reach the maximum level to 1300 for example...

otland.net

In-game progress remains normal. Just the client that no longer works properly.

        static uint64_t getExpForLevel(int32_t lv) {
            lv--;
            return ((50ULL * lv * lv * lv) - (150ULL * lv * lv) + (400ULL * lv)) / 3ULL;
        }

That's what I use.

Post automatically merged: Mar 7, 2024

I changed this to 64 and it works, I go from 639, however the exp number is bugged, but it is counting the level.

    if (player->getExperience() >= std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()) {
        msg.add<uint64_t>(0);
    } else {
        msg.add<uint32_t>(static_cast<uint32_t>(player->getExperience()));
    }

 

[Mateus Robeerto]

I helped a guy where we managed to get a limit of up to 100k here to substitute into your source code. After that, you'll need to control the stage.xml to know which limit you want per level. If it's a limit of 1000, then make the stages correctly. It should be resolved by now.

static uint64_t getExpForLevel(const uint64_t lv)
{
return ((1ULL * lv * lv * lv) - (50ULL * lv * lv) + (1200ULL * lv)) / 3ULL;
}

 

[jimmywest10]

I changed this to 64 and it works, I go from 639, however the exp number is bugged, but it is counting the level.

    if (player->getExperience() >= std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()) {
        msg.add<uint64_t>(0);
    } else {
        msg.add<uint32_t>(static_cast<uint32_t>(player->getExperience()));
    }

It's not bugged, you guys are just coming up with really bad game design and giving people insane levels which it wasn't designed to have.

You need to change it to uint64_t in the else block not just check if the double (experience in this case) is bigger than 18446744073709551615

msg.add<uint64_t>(static_cast<uint64_t>(player->getExperience()));

 

[Piifafa]

It's not bugged, you guys are just coming up with really bad game design and giving people insane levels which it wasn't designed to have.

You need to change it to uint64_t in the else block not just check if the double (experience in this case) is bigger than 18446744073709551615

msg.add<uint64_t>(static_cast<uint64_t>(player->getExperience()));

It doesn't work.

But doing it the way I did before is looking like this after level 638...

Post automatically merged: Mar 7, 2024

I helped a guy where we managed to get a limit of up to 100k here to substitute into your source code. After that, you'll need to control the stage.xml to know which limit you want per level. If it's a limit of 1000, then make the stages correctly. It should be resolved by now.

static uint64_t getExpForLevel(const uint64_t lv)
{
return ((1ULL * lv * lv * lv) - (50ULL * lv * lv) + (1200ULL * lv)) / 3ULL;
}

With this change, would the client be able to read normally?

 

[Mateus Robeerto]

With this change, would the client be able to read normally?

The Cip client has a limit of only 65k levels, but it only reads up to the 65k level limit.

 

[jimmywest10]

I shouldn't have bothered, edubart's otclient looks like this:

 

[Pifafa]

I shouldn't have bothered, edubart's otclient looks like this:View attachment 82800

Yes, it's buggy, now how to solve it I don't know, I'll try something else.

 

[Pifafa]

I haven't been able to resolve this.

 

[Pifafa]

any light?