What would you prefer?

[Archez]

Do you prefer an OT wich map has teleporters to go hunting or an OT wich map you have to explore and discover?

Answer in the poll.
There's no problem if you post.

 

[TheNotoriousNaS]

Without teleports. But not walk 10 mins for 5 spawns.

 

[krille09]

If it were Radonia, then yes. Evolutions, tps... so boring map . Real tibian map... roflmao, i go with gm over the hole content, just mapclick l8er xd

 

[Crewe]

Without teleports, for sure.

 

[clone]

without teles but the spawns shouldnt be to spread out like they have to be in convenient places.

 

[ntmr]

Without teleports, but with "intuitive" hunting places.

 

[Randyf00]

I was going to do the same poll Akor, but thanks for putting this thread ^.-. Also i like exploring and plus it stops noobs from going in and out of tps when getting pked >.<

 

[Archez]

Well, thank you all for answering the poll, I was thinking how's gonna be my OT.

No hunting areas TPs.

 

[Gangsta-jr]

agree with Seabitz


No Tp's , just makes ur ot Bad
Also not too far away from the city
I'd prefer some citys but you can travel by boat and the huntspots arent far away from the boats

 

[Archez]

I'll do that , Thank You...

 

[hiperkarma]

Much much teleports, much much monsters much much money

 

[RunarM]

Map without teleporters, you have to explore it.

 

[Amrosh]

@ Runarm Same here

 

[Zisly]

No tp's! it just ruins the game

 

[Hellrage]

without of course, but as said not to long to hunting spots.
Also mix regular, easy-to-find spots, and hidden-pick-hole spots (with better monsters or spawns.

Like radonia used to be, but don't leave half the map just grass and trees and no spawns