jolle__jkpg
Active Member
LinkGot the same problem about the magic effects
around number 103 or something its not working anymore
LinkGot the same problem about the magic effects
around number 103 or something its not working anymore
To be honest, all magic effects not display for me. @jolle__jkpg I will see your solution!Got the same problem about the magic effects
around number 103 or something its not working anymore
I have TFS 1.4 for tibia client 10.98 with custom sprites from 12+ and I use this OTclient. But with OTServ BR and OTG premium I guess this release not working.is your otcleint compatibile with 12.64 tibia engine please help
Work properly on 7.x?
Really wish there was just 1 distribution for Otclient.
otv8 can suck my fart hole.
Not sure if it's fixed but blood splashes made stairs disappear and also borders.Work properly on 7.x?
Really wish there was just 1 distribution for Otclient.
otv8 can suck my fart hole.
After some drama in the repo's issues I've gotta be honest and say that I highly and wholeheartedly recommend against using otclient1.0 or even supporting otclient1.0 financially, partially because of poor design choices, partially because of the owner himself.
Mehah invited me to try it out by linking it to me in my thread a long time ago, it was riddled with bugs including (D)DoSing vanilla TFS 1.3 (with over 100pps packet flood) just from stepping diagonally once at the time, and instead of wanting to fix this issue he blamed TFS for not having proper diagonal step rules, I don't know if he actually fixed this issue later or not, but it sounded like he wasn't interested in ever fixing this issue (and is a design flaw of his as he has hardcoded rules into the client instead of the client being lenient and adaptive like the original otclient).
This is a pattern I've seen again and again, he overestimates his own capacity and blames everything/everyone else if he doesn't know how to fix it (or even sometimes doesn't understand the issue, but pretends he does and even pretends it's already fixed when it isn't, he also asked for money in a git issue to fix certain issues).
I didn't want to say anything negative earlier because I don't like to judge prematurely, and I don't like being negative unnecessarily, but I've gotta be honest and say that otclient1.0 is a very unstable version of otclient, mainly (if not only) targeting the newest prototocol which mehah admitted himself in a github issue, it doesn't really seek to have compatibility with older versions, and I think it's riddled with poor design issues which results in serious long-term bugs/stability issues for anyone using this client.
I honestly recommend OpenTibiaUnity over this one even though OTU was always in beta or whatever, because at least it has some interesting features such as being web and android compliant, and I've experienced less bugs with OTU than I have with otclient1.0.
Just my 5 cents, good luck.
Not the best response to such allegations/criticism.wtf, you're a crybaby, I'm not in the project just to correct, I'm refactoring, but anyway, I won't waste my time with crybaby.
it's because you didn't see the discussion in a issue of the repository of him calling everyone a monkey.Not the best response to such allegations/criticism.
See, if you said that in your previous post and added some more info, my post wouldn't be there.it's because you didn't see the discussion in a issue of the repository of him calling everyone a monkey.
What does this mean to people who aren't advanced developers?Sorry for interrupting guys, but I think a big thing just dropped into mehah otc pull requests (for people interested though).
Protobuf support by nekiro · Pull Request #213 · mehah/otclient
This is protobuf support for newest protocols. Drop your content of assets directory just like you would do with normal .dat/.spr files and watch the magic happen. Additionally to it being able to ...github.com
It means that you can take protocol 12 assets straight out of the folder and load it up into otclient.What does this mean to people who aren't advanced developers?