Syntax's first ever Dixter SPINOFF!11!!

[stian]

Actually it was the other way around .

On the american side there was 650,000 south vietnamese, 536,000 americans, 312 south koreans and some other nations. A total of about 1.2 million.

On the north vietnamese side it was about 520,000 in total 8they was quicky replaced upon death).

And they still managed to lose even if they was more powerful. The north side did however loose a place between 1.1 and 1.2 million, unlike the south that only lost about 315,000.

 

[Bintzer]

You misunderstand my point, The U.S contributed to the war A LOT, however it provided no TURNING POINTS. The axis forces would have still lost as all the ground that the U.S took back, was already taken by the Germans and they were still losing to the Russians. (Before you read this next sentence know this: I do not like Russia, especially for what they did in world war 2, and the communism and hardship, which most of you have no clue about, they brought about in eastern Europe. The Russians were protecting their land which the Germans haven't captured yet. Do you know why Stalingrad was the turning point of World War 2, it had to do with 2 things: Oil and morale. Behind Stalingrad were huge deposits of oil and natural resources which BOTH sides had A LOT to gain from possessing them. If Stalingrad fell, it would have been a huge economical defeat for Russia, but also a defeat in morale. If you're an American, imagine if Washington D.C fell in a war, you would be seriously demoralized.

I totally agree with the Americans dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

That post was aimed at Seylit, not you.
Also, I never even mentioned the war in Europe so how is any of that relevant?

Actually it was the other way around .

On the american side there was 650,000 south vietnamese, 536,000 americans, 312 south koreans and some other nations. A total of about 1.2 million.

On the north vietnamese side it was about 520,000 in total 8they was quicky replaced upon death).

And they still managed to lose even if they was more powerful. The north side did however loose a place between 1.1 and 1.2 million, unlike the south that only lost about 315,000.

He was talking about the death count, not the number of troops.
There was more than one reason why we lost the war, but the main reason was that it was so protested against by the American people. We pulled out before we could finish the job.

 

[Dixter]

That post was aimed at Seylit, not you.
Also, I never even mentioned the war in Europe so how is any of that relevant?


He was talking about the death count, not the number of troops.
There was more than one reason why we lost the war, but the main reason was that it was so protested against by the American people. We pulled out before we could finish the job.

The European Theater was the most important, and as I said, Japan would have fallen anyway.

The Americans lost in Vietnam because the Vietnamese had superb knowledge of the terrain and conditions, because they LIVED THERE. Stop making up bullshit. America got their asses kicked in Vietnam. It's not like they were winning and were forced to pull out. They were being pushed back the whole time, and then they finally pulled out.

 

[Evan]

Let's see some sources huh? And as I recall from previous research, U.S forces were pushed back through Vietnam, and finally withdrew altogether. The Vietnamese did lose more troops I think, don't remember the numbers, but that doesn't mean they lost the war lol. The Soviets lost like 2 million SOLDIERS, and the Germans 400,000 I think(against the Soviets), but the Soviets still beat the Germans. America lost the war in Vietnam, any historian will tell you that.

I never said they didn't lose the war.

 

[Dixter]

Well I guess this spinoff fails. Firstly, because I actually know and study world war 2, and you base your opinions on movies or a miniseries you have seen. Secondly, you post stupid comments, thinking you're insulting me when actually you insult your own intelligence.

P.S About the IQ thing. IQ is NOT general knowledge, did you ever take an iq test on the internet? They don't really tell you your exact iq because they don't have enough questions, but the questions are setup similiarly. They never ask you about historical events or any hard problems. They ask questions that test your level of reasoning.

 

[Syntax]

Well I guess this spinoff fails. Firstly, because I actually know and study world war 2, and you base your opinions on movies or a miniseries you have seen. Secondly, you post stupid comments, thinking you're insulting me when actually you insult your own intelligence.

P.S About the IQ thing. IQ is NOT general knowledge, did you ever take an iq test on the internet? They don't really tell you your exact iq because they don't have enough questions, but the questions are setup similiarly. They never ask you about historical events or any hard problems. They ask questions that test your level of reasoning.

Lol, I love how you ignore every point you fail in and just focus on the shit you've been repeating over and over as well as the offtopic crap. You may have studied about it but you sure as hell aren't educated enough about it to hold you own in a debate. You were the one who started the insulting comments in the other thread so you yourself insult your so called intelligence.

 

[Summit]

Assuming that Americans are ignorant is a pathetic comment that only proves you yourself are ignorant. Pointless and groundless hate like that is the very reason insidents like WW2 happend. Do society a favore, keep quiet unless saying something constructive.

 

[Dixter]

Lol, I love how you ignore every point you fail in and just focus on the shit you've been repeating over and over as well as the offtopic crap. You may have studied about it but you sure as hell aren't educated enough about it to hold you own in a debate. You were the one who started the insulting comments in the other thread so you yourself insult your so called intelligence.

And what points do I fail in? I've answered every argument you've had. I study about it, and I can express myself many many times better than you, since I have a very expanded vocabulary, and yours is well.... smalller.

I explain those points more times because you obviously can't read, or you just can understand something when I post it one time. You present an argument, I counter it, and since you can't understand half the things I write, you just post the same argument in different words.

No I did not start the insulting comments, lostboy started posting shit.

 

[Dixter]

Assuming that Americans are ignorant is a pathetic comment that only proves you yourself are ignorant. Pointless and groundless hate like that is the very reason insidents like WW2 happend. Do society a favore, keep quiet unless saying something constructive.

Ignorant means misinformed, or poorly educated, or not educated at all. Compared to other countries, USA's education is laughable. I did not "assume" anything, I just said that from what I've met, most of them were ignorant. Again, like I said but you fail to read my posts, there are intelligent Americans. I myself have met few, and so my judgment is on the average American I know.

 

[Syntax]

And what points do I fail in? I've answered every argument you've had. I study about it, and I can express myself many many times better than you, since I have a very expanded vocabulary, and yours is well.... smalller.

I explain those points more times because you obviously can't read, or you just can understand something when I post it one time. You present an argument, I counter it, and since you can't understand half the things I write, you just post the same argument in different words.

No I did not start the insulting comments, lostboy started posting shit.

"A very expanded vocabulary" Wow. Anyway, I've only posted I think twice, how about countering the first post. Also, for the record, a three year old could understand you.

Ignorant means misinformed, or poorly educated, or not educated at all. Compared to other countries, USA's education is laughable. I did not "assume" anything, I just said that from what I've met, most of them were ignorant. Again, like I said but you fail to read my posts, there are intelligent Americans. I myself have met few, and so my judgment is on the average American I know.

You just defined "stereotyping". I suppose I could say the same for the average Polish person. 90% of pls ask me for items so...thats how they are huh?

 

[Delirium]

Thread closed on starter's request.