Complaint Hacking and Stealing (Files and posting them here)

[Ns Sparkz]

Before Accepting The File,The moderater Should be asking "Where did u get this from"?
Because People just hack and take the files and database then upload then straight to otland to Realse The stolen files.

Or Do u support hacking?

 

[Zisly]

Understanding Copyright And Licenses | Smashing Magazine

Doubt anyone is gonna give a shit though, the general mentality seems to be; "if I can access the files somehow, they're mine to do whatever with!".

 

[____________]

Exactly Zisly.

Most naive people seem to ignore the actual law and substitutes their own 'fake' law.

 

[Korrex]

@all mods
where the fuck is the 'approved' comment on that masiyah files? How do we know they are safe etc?

It's a datapack.
Which means no executables.
Which in itself means that it can't be a virus.
(Haven't red the whole thread yet so dunno if this has been stated already)

 

[Sweddy]

You only have rights over something you did yourself, if your datapack includes a single file that you didn't made, then you don't own it and it can be posted

edited as of J.Dre post

Lets say this in another point of view to the hacker or w/e "You only have rights over something you did yourself, if your datapack includes a single file that you didn't made, then you don't own it and it can be posted" So the owner got more rights than the "hacker/stealer or w/e". Because he/she did something atleast didnt he/she?, The hacker does not have ANY right at all does he/she? It sounds logical, The owner maybe did atleast 1 file of 100 files that means 1% rights about the datapack while the hacker didnt do anything = 0% rights. I dont know what you think but this seems logical... ;o

Even if all the scripts and ect. was made by other ppls than the owner, the owner did the job to make something out of it.
Example: We say some guys own some LEGO parts, they give it to a guy for free and he builds a good thing out of this parts, Does the thief(hacker) have the right to give that thing he build out for free?

This may sound stupid...

 

[OT Stuffs]

let me turn this around..

How many fucks does anyone gives, that movies are shared for free over torrents(piracy), except the companies making the movies and trying to make money out of them?
So with that number, how many fucks would be given the day, someone post some stolen text messages in lua/xml/w.e?

 

[Bintzer]

any serious developer would make sure their content is secured. if not, then you have a long way to go and you should learn from your mistakes instead of searching for our sympathy because you will find none

if you own something valuable there will always be people out to take it from you. if they succeed its noones fault but your own. take responsibility for your foolishness

 

[Korrex]

Lets say this in another point of view to the hacker or w/e "You only have rights over something you did yourself, if your datapack includes a single file that you didn't made, then you don't own it and it can be posted" So the owner got more rights than the "hacker/stealer or w/e". Because he/she did something atleast didnt he/she?, The hacker does not have ANY right at all does he/she? It sounds logical, The owner maybe did atleast 1 file of 100 files that means 1% rights about the datapack while the hacker didnt do anything = 0% rights. I dont know what you think but this seems logical... ;o

Even if all the scripts and ect. was made by other ppls than the owner, the owner did the job to make something out of it.
Example: We say some guys own some LEGO parts, they give it to a guy for free and he builds a good thing out of this parts, Does the thief(hacker) have the right to give that thing he build out for free?

This may sound stupid...

It does sound stupid tbh...

 

[Sweddy]

It does sound stupid tbh...

Tell me what

 

[hodleo]

Seems this led nowhere.