Ignore if storage xx

[xLosT]

How do add not teleport a player with storage xx

i change this

  local pos, player = mapPositions[newTemple]
        player = players[i]
        player:teleportTo(pos)

to this

        local pos, player = mapPositions[newTemple], players[i]
     if player:getStorageValue(81262) == 1 then
            player:teleportTo(pos)

So do not teleport anyone

function onThink(interval, lastExecution)

    if string.lower(rotateMaps) ~= "yes" then
        return true
    end

    local players = Game.getPlayers()
    local currentTemple = Game.getStorageValue(currentMap)

    if #players == 0 then
        return true
    end

    if currentTemple == numberOfMaps then
        Game.setStorageValue(currentMap, 1)
        else
        Game.setStorageValue(currentMap, Game.getStorageValue(currentMap) + 1)
    end

    for i = 1, #players do
        local newTemple = Game.getStorageValue(currentMap)
        local pos, player = mapPositions[newTemple]
        player = players[i]
        player:teleportTo(pos)
        player:addHealth(player:getMaxHealth())
        player:addMana(player:getMaxMana())
        local tmp = {CONDITION_POISON, CONDITION_FIRE, CONDITION_ENERGY, CONDITION_BLEEDING, CONDITION_PARALYZE, CONDITION_INVISIBLE, CONDITION_MANASHIELD, CONDITION_INFIGHT, CONDITION_DRUNK, CONDITION_DROWN, CONDITION_ATTRIBUTES, CONDITION_FREEZING, CONDITION_DAZZLED, CONDITION_CURSED, CONDITION_PACIFIED, CONDITION_SPELLCOOLDOWN, CONDITION_SPELLGROUPCOOLDOWN}
        for i = 1, #tmp do
            player:removeCondition(tmp[i])
        end
        player:sendTextMessage(MESSAGE_STATUS_WARNING, mapChangeText)
    end

    return true
end

 

[andu]

How do add not teleport a player with storage xx

Edited, compromise logic to make it work for tfs and few unique coded engines

if not player:getStorageValue(81262) ~= nil and not player:getStorageValue(81262) ~= -1 then
    player:teleportTo(pos)
end

 

[496815]

if player:getStorageValue(81262) ~= 1 then
    player:teleportTo(pos)
end

 

[Infernum]

if player:getStorageValue(81262) == nil then
           player:teleportTo(pos)
end

all storages return -1 by default, not nil

 

[andu]

all storages return -1 by default, not nil

Many engines before TFS, and even older TFS were using lua_pushnil (L);

That's why this is the best compromise option:

if player:getStorageValue(81262) ~= nil and player:getStorageValue(81262) ~= -1 then
    return false
else
    player:teleportTo(pos)
end

And right, 1.0 have -1

 

[tokenzz]

Many engines before TFS, and even older TFS were using lua_pushnil (L);

That's why this is the best compromise option:

if player:getStorageValue(81262) ~= nil and player:getStorageValue(81262) ~= -1 then
    return false
else
    player:teleportTo(pos)
end

And right, 1.0 have -1

older tfs engines don't use metamethods, and since this is for sure 1.x you can ignore

if player:getStorageValue(81262) ~= nil

Why? Well, when is a storagevalue going to become nil? If you can answer this question then I can agree with you. If not, it's just an unnecessary imperative.

 

[Infernum]

Many engines before TFS, and even older TFS were using lua_pushnil (L);

That's why this is the best compromise option:

if player:getStorageValue(81262) ~= nil and player:getStorageValue(81262) ~= -1 then
    return false
else
    player:teleportTo(pos)
end

And right, 1.0 have -1

i used 0.3.6/0.4 for over a year till i moved to 1.x
not sure about older versions before 0.3.6 but it's always been -1
either way xLost is using 1.2

 

[andu]

i used 0.3.6/0.4 for over a year till i moved to 1.x
not sure about older versions before 0.3.6 but it's always been -1
either way xLost is using 1.2

Then you started 6-7 years later. You have own scripting service, you should look around for old scripts and how ppl were using compromise logics there to make script working on few different distro

 

[tokenzz]

Then you started 6-7 years later. You have own scripting service, you should look around for old scripts and how ppl were using compromise logics there to make script working on few different distro

do you mean that you've been doing Lua scripts for that long? I don't really understand, sorry