We generally don't delete threads on request, that's why your report was rejected. Even if post editing was possible you wouldn't be able to delete the thread.
Ok, but I'd be able to change the thread up to my likings and possibly continue using the same thread if I'm not allowed to delete my own thread.
But I also did just quote you saying in this very thread
We generally don't care about deleting useless content. Premium members always had the ability to delete their own posts/threads.
Now you're saying you generally don't allow thread deletions on request. So I suppose what you're saying is.... only premium members are allowed to have their threads deleted period full stop?
Any other quirky premium features like these stated anywhere, or might you be so kind as to share them with me so I may know what I can and can't do in comparison to premium members?
Not trying to criticize, just trying to understand the dynamics of this forum these days.
Do you have anything specific you want me to go over?
In what regards exactly? If you mean about my earlier infractions, sure, feel free to look them up.
I argue that every single infraction except the very last one I got was both completely unjust and unexplained (the last one I got was also unexplained, but I assume it's because a regular member whom I've had beef with before came into my thread being passive aggressive and literally trolling my thread with arrogant literal nonsense, and when I responded in the same passive aggressive way and he and his friends just kept trolling I decided to call him a "moron" not being aware that was a rule violation at the time, and I guess that was so excessive and terrible of me that I just had to get my thread locked, have a global mod trying to publicly shame me before locking the thread by saying that I'm "not able to behave" without giving me a chance to ask questions or respond, and give me an unknown infraction - I suppose based on the information you just gave me at the end of your post I probably got one point for that. I'll accept that one point/infraction and some blame for having used this terribly evil and dehumanizing word, but again every infraction previous to that was unjust.
You should consider each warning to be serious, not just wait until you have the last one before getting a ban to stop breaking rules.
Indeed that's why I literally PM'd every single moderator who ever gave me a warning/infraction
asking for a clarification about what I did in an effort to understand and learn what I did wrong so I can adapt, or as you say stop breaking the rules, but never actually got a decent answer even once.
Appreciate the lecture though.
Also, moderators can give you a warning with any number of points. You need 3 active points to be banned. You currently have one point active and 2 points inactive.
Ok, nice. Does inactive points basically mean they no longer count, like a historical record, or can they be activated again somehow? I feel like I have to ask since pretty much nothing about this forum surprises me anymore and I'm not sure I can expect any kind of consistency or sense of justice at all, so might as well ask.
That said, it would've been really nice if these messages/warnings/infractions actually told you how many points you were given though, as you might agree with me there are still greater and lesser offenses, just like with the law, right?
As in one might either be pardoned or get a small ticket for minor accidental mistakes, but get a lifesentence in the case of murder, and hopefully you acknowledge there's a difference between two?
Btw on the topic of major violations of the law and human decency, was R.yan ever punished when his messages were leaked of him admitting himself to have consistently and persistently DDoSed several different (major) OTS a few years back? Just curious.