Souldrainer
Radonia~
i dont understand or i dont need to say i now i need to say 1? xD
1 dont understand or 1 dont need to say 1 now 1 need to say 1? xD
Shut up please XD
i dont understand or i dont need to say i now i need to say 1? xD
1 dont understand or 1 dont need to say 1 now 1 need to say 1? xD
In fact its better to claim that you are referring this to the media, I would think if you're such a "smart" "philosopher" then you would have figured that less then a fraction of this community does know about the complex numbers and in that case you should have written this in another fashion. As a philosopher, as you refer yourself as you should not put it in mathematical terms.Hello dear readers.
I made this provoking title to point out the wrong way of Media to bring any information to us.
The title was not supposed to inform you of a discovery.
There is no discovery in this thread.
Is that better?
Why do you talk shit about mathematicians when you yourself used mathematics in your so-called referring to the mainstream media?(and that I have to explain you this, certainly does mark the abilities of a philosopher, that mathematicians does not necessarily have, while a philosopher is required to have)
If you were aware of it, why make yourself a fool amongst those who does understand mathematics, stick to your philosophy in that case.Now again, you did not notice that I agreed with your "proof", and that I was already aware of this before you attempted to "disprove me"
Aint mathematical fundamentalism to be thinking "outside the box"?while you were in fact only disproving my intentionally shallow statements and that you were not even aware of that were intentionally put in a manner for it to be misunderstood by those who exclude thinking in their every-day-life.
Never been, your statements about mathematics still are tho.If you're still a big questionmark, I give up.
In fact its better to claim that you are referring this to the media, I would think if you're such a "smart" "philosopher" then you would have figured that less then a fraction of this community does know about the complex numbers and in that case you should have written this in another fashion. As a philosopher, as you refer yourself as you should not put it in mathematical terms.Hello dear readers.
I made this provoking title to point out the wrong way of Media to bring any information to us.
The title was not supposed to inform you of a discovery.
There is no discovery in this thread.
Is that better?
Why do you talk shit about mathematicians when you yourself used mathematics in your so-called referring to the mainstream media?(and that I have to explain you this, certainly does mark the abilities of a philosopher, that mathematicians does not necessarily have, while a philosopher is required to have)
If you were aware of it, why make yourself a fool amongst those who does understand mathematics, stick to your philosophy in that case.Now again, you did not notice that I agreed with your "proof", and that I was already aware of this before you attempted to "disprove me"
Aint mathematical fundamentalism to be thinking "outside the box"?while you were in fact only disproving my intentionally shallow statements and that you were not even aware of that were intentionally put in a manner for it to be misunderstood by those who exclude thinking in their every-day-life.
Never been, your statements about mathematics still are tho.If you're still a big questionmark, I give up.
What does the ^ sign mean. ?
Well, philosophy does not contribute a fraction as much as mathematics does to the evolution of the society.