OTClient 1.0
- Thread starter Mehah
- Start date
OP
OP
Mehah
Excellent OT User
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2015
- Messages
- 164
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 890
at first I'm not interested in updating the protocol or maintaining compatibility with old versions, even if it's not difficult, but it's kind of boring.
strange, make sure you have not compiled in DEBUG mode, if so, this is the problem ...
this feature will be very laborious, for now, I will not implement it.
thx a lot, you just got me drunk.Amazing work!Sent you a donation for a well deserved beer.
at first I'm not interested in updating the protocol or maintaining compatibility with old versions, even if it's not difficult, but it's kind of boring.
strange, make sure you have not compiled in DEBUG mode, if so, this is the problem ...
this feature will be very laborious, for now, I will not implement it.
thx a lot, you just got me drunk.
Gyazo Screen Video
Gyazo Screen Video
Gyazo Screen Video
to verify im not trying to bash your OTCLIENT, not at all. im trying to give my test results so you can improve , i admire your work for the community very much, thank you!
All the clients compiled to 64x release
OP
OP
Mehah
Excellent OT User
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2015
- Messages
- 164
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 890
it really is strange, make sure you are not giving an error on the client console.Mehahs OTCLIENT (as you can see its laggin i even got 10fps sometimes and ping spiking to 500~)Gyazo Screen Video
gyazo.com
EDUBARTS OTCLIENT (fps are dropping but nothing freezing , the ping stays normal the fps is above 60)Gyazo Screen Video
Kondrahs (no fps drops at all , everything is smooth as butter)Gyazo Screen Video
to verify im not trying to bash your OTCLIENT, not at all. im trying to give my test results so you can improve , i admire your work for the community very much, thank you!
All the clients compiled to 64x release
OP
OP
Mehah
Excellent OT User
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2015
- Messages
- 164
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 890
Sorry not sure what u mean, are you asking if i am getting any errors on the terminal? i just checked and i am getting some error indeed:
Gyazo
so that's why your FPS is dropping dramatically.
do a test by disabling the battle module and the terminal.
Last edited:
infrator123
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 2
can you test without battle module?
Turned off the module and its working as intended , no lags , no fps drops whatsoever.
Gyazo Screen Video
Any idea why im getting this battle error tho? i just freshly compiled it again and have the same bug , while compiling i noticed this error:
Gyazo
Theres was no other errors while compiling.
OP
OP
Mehah
Excellent OT User
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2015
- Messages
- 164
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 890
I'll take a look at the battle module and about this "error", it's just a warning, I've already corrected it, but I haven't yet committed it.Turned off the module and its working as intended , no lags , no fps drops whatsoever.
Gyazo Screen Video
Any idea why im getting this battle error tho? i just freshly compiled it again and have the same bug , while compiling i noticed this error:
Gyazo
Theres was no other errors while compiling.
I also have noticed one more 'bug'
Gyazo Screen Video
You also cannot for example magicwall behind him because the same error occurs, the client still thinks the SQM is occupied.
Gyazo Screen Video
OP
OP
Mehah
Excellent OT User
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2015
- Messages
- 164
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 890
at first it is not the focus now, but in any case, make a report on github, explaining the problem in detail and how to reproduce it, that when I have some time, I will take a look.I also have noticed one more 'bug'
The hitboxes are off, you for example can hit hmm while the player is already on the other sqm.Gyazo Screen Video
You also cannot for example magicwall behind him because the same error occurs, the client still thinks the SQM is occupied.
Idk if you are dealing with such bugs tho or u are just trying to optimize the client. Let me know if u need any more testing from me.Gyazo Screen Video
Done!
OP
OP
Mehah
Excellent OT User
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2015
- Messages
- 164
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 890
thanks so much, if you continue like this, in a little while nobody else will have to pay $5k.Donated, thank you for what you do. Will donated monthly and more
Performance Test:
CPU: I7 4770
GPU: HD 4600
Scale: 40x20
unfortunately for me to do a test with a larger size I will have to modify the package management, because currently there is a limit and I am too lazy to modify it just to make a benchmark.
[Scale: 8x6]
[Free]
[5k]
[free(otclient.exe) vs 5k(otclient_gl.exe)] (at the same time)
OT 1.0 consumes less CPU, since drawing requests are based on events and therefore end up having less processing "(LOOP)".
one thing cannot be denied, the “5k” has better management on the GPU, but we are talking about something free vs paid.
but if you want something better, I recommend using the @fabian766 client
Note: unfortunately the client is not good enough to make a test recording, since the application I used to record used 30% of the GPU.
Last edited:
oen432
Legendary OT User
No one has to pay for v8.
People think that they need sources but they are wrong, 95% of client editing can be done via modules, 5% is so advanced that not even a lot of people in this community would be able to do.
Until there is proper encryption and compression with updater like in v8, even this client won't be used by many because it changes A LOT.
Renato Foot
Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2017
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 17
OP
OP
Mehah
Excellent OT User
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2015
- Messages
- 164
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 890
I agree, I don't take the credit out of the v8, I'm just giving people one more option.
