C/C++ Teach yourself C++ in 21 days

[Zonet]

ty !

Wnat a better?
Here you are.

#include <iostream>
int main() {
int a, b;
a = 0;
b = 1000000000;
while(a < b) {
	std::cout << "Hello - My name is Zonet, this is a buggy program ok?";
		a++;
		std::cout << std::endl;
	}
	system("PAUSE");
return 0;
}

test plx.

 

[Zisly]

Wnat a better?
Here you are.

#include <iostream>
int main() {
int a, b;
a = 0;
b = 1000000000;
while(a < b) {
	std::cout << "Hello - My name is Zonet, this is a buggy program ok?";
		a++;
		std::cout << std::endl;
	}
	system("PAUSE");
return 0;
}

test plx.

Lol, that will finnish pretty fast xD

 

[Zonet]

Lol, that will finnish pretty fast xD

xD, you like ?

 

[nclx]

zonet i told you man...
int a, b; is not C++, its C.

system("pause > nul"); looks better.

return values in small program like those, is not needed ;s.

 

[Winnerandy]

You guys sounds/look like nerds x), with all the system("pause > nul");, nul ect xD

 

[jaertana]

thanks mate, rep++

 

[Zonet]

You guys sounds/look like nerds x), with all the system("pause > nul");, nul ect xD

Lol, it's actually the first thing you learn when reading.

 

[stian]

Not use system("PAUSE");, that is a Widnows bound feature. Use cin.get();
instead.

 

[Zonet]

Not use system("PAUSE");, that is a Widnows bound feature. Use cin.get();
instead.

thanks pro

 

[6277310]

Thank you for this wonderful book thingy ;o This helped me out a lot, although i'm not very good yet

 

[6277310]

/* clock example: countdown */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

void wait ( int seconds )
{
  clock_t endwait;
  endwait = clock () + seconds * CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
  while (clock() < endwait) {}
}

             
int main() {

    cout << "Wait 10 seconds :o";

    wait(10);
    
        system("cls");
    cout << "10 seconds have now passed :o" << endl;


    
    system("pause");
}

Anyone dare to try it?

 

[Zisly]

why not just sleep(10*1000);?

 

[6277310]

why not just sleep(10*1000);?

Because this looks waaay much more pro, and it's easy to make it take decimals also just change

 void wait ( int seconds )

for

 void wait (double seconds )

and then use wait(number with deciamls) instead of having to calculate through math

 

[Santy]

It would just be sleep(1528)
:/

Sleep is more efficient.

 

[6277310]

Awww can't a man have some fun acting like a show-off? :'(

 

[stian]

No, do it right or don't do it at all. Sleep is way better because it's not platform dependant too.

 

[Mark]

No, do it right or don't do it at all. Sleep is way better because it's not platform dependant too.

It kindof is, Sleep is the Windows function that takes milliseconds as parameter. sleep (yes, lowercase) is the Linux (unistd) function and takes seconds as parameter.

 

[Zisly]

Because this looks waaay much more pro, and it's easy to make it take decimals also just change

 void wait ( int seconds )

for

 void wait (double seconds )

and then use wait(number with deciamls) instead of having to calculate through math

Who cares if it looks "pro"?

 

[stian]

#ifndef __MINGW32
#include <unistd.h>

void Sleep(unsigned int  useconds )
{
    usleep( useconds * 1000 );
}

#else
#include <windows.h>
#endif

 

[Jagkanprata]

Cant dl, rehost pls