AncientAngelus
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 3
Any update for this for tfs 1.4 and otclient from mehah?
[Tutorial] Adding more tiles to game window - Updated 7/6/2018
- Thread starter Flatlander
- Start date
In tfs 1.4.2 this is already being implemented, you just need to change it in SERVER/SRC/map.h, at line: 160.
C++:
static constexpr int32_t maxViewportX = 11; //min value: maxClientViewportX + 1
static constexpr int32_t maxViewportY = 11; //min value: maxClientViewportY + 1
static constexpr int32_t maxClientViewportX = 8;
static constexpr int32_t maxClientViewportY = 6;And in Mehah 2.0 release, in CLIENT/SRC/map.cpp, at line 40
C++:
MAX_VIEWPORT_X = 8, MAX_VIEWPORT_Y = 6;And done...
I tested this today at twice the normal size:
Hope this helps!
AncientAngelus
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 3
thank you for your response! question: i believe you are using the regular modeview, what if you change to viewmode 2? like to remove the side gray bars and just have the whole map? like this. and which values do you recommend?
Like This ?
In this print above, I put the X = 16 and the Y = 9, but you can put it smaller, I put these values to get as close to the 16:9 aspect ratio, which is the most used by monitors today.
If you disable 'Limit Visible Dimension', you can see with ctrl -, a better view of the aspect ratio.
leotrolez
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2018
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 1
You need to edit ServerSide too, like this:
ServerSide:
C++:
static constexpr int32_t maxViewportX = 17; //min value: maxClientViewportX + 1
static constexpr int32_t maxViewportY = 10; //min value: maxClientViewportY + 1
static constexpr int32_t maxClientViewportX = 16;
static constexpr int32_t maxClientViewportY = 9;
C++:
MAX_VIEWPORT_X = 16, MAX_VIEWPORT_Y = 9;
marcelomnzs
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
- Messages
- 159
- Reaction score
- 40
do u think is possible only gm have this view?
and i'm thinking if 16x9 is a nice choice to pvp..
Everything is possible with sources.
can someone explain why im getting these 3 checkboxes showing up when i enable sidebars in viewmode2?
only changes ive done in gameinterface.lua from latest mehah-otclient is forcing viewmode2 and put gameMapPanel:setKeepAspectRatio(false) under mode == 2 then
only changes ive done in gameinterface.lua from latest mehah-otclient is forcing viewmode2 and put gameMapPanel:setKeepAspectRatio(false) under mode == 2 then
Togu
Advanced OT User
For anybody trying to implement that on TFS 1.5:
otland.net
Remeber you should also edit
[OTC Mehah] Fix problems in increasing the map view
My source used: 0.3.6 TFS OTClient - Redemption 1.0 rev 0.000 (desenv) built on Jul 3 2023 for arch x64 Guys, the idea of this topic is to clarify information that I found in several places to compose the content that already exists and not leave room for common mistakes like what happened to...
setup.otml
marcelomnzs
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
- Messages
- 159
- Reaction score
- 40
do you know how?
if I limite the client player with feature GameDebug on and with my custom client to game master, i will only have more titles in custom client?
otservavatar
Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2019
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 9
Done.
Last edited:
marcelomnzs
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
- Messages
- 159
- Reaction score
- 40
I took it to make this customization now, I managed to implement it. but I noticed significant increased cpu usage:
if I put it in map.h
something like:
static constexpr int32_t maxViewportX = 161; //min value: maxClientViewportX + 1
static constexpr int32_t maxViewportY = 91; //min value: maxClientViewportY + 1
static constexpr int32_t maxClientViewportX = 160;
static constexpr int32_t maxClientViewportY = 90;
CPU usage, which used to be around 4~6%, is now using 30%+,
If I use values like 250+ the machine crashes when opening the server.
and like 25/13 usage about 15%+
My idea was to put the enlarged view only for my game master, for my player checks.
You can set a lower value and use less CPU but I would like to try something different.
What could be causing this stress?
Maybe remove the MoveCreature since they don't need to see the gm, leaving just the CanSee?
Or does anyone know where this function call is located through the player so I can only put it if the player is gm sending the larger view?
if I put it in map.h
something like:
static constexpr int32_t maxViewportX = 161; //min value: maxClientViewportX + 1
static constexpr int32_t maxViewportY = 91; //min value: maxClientViewportY + 1
static constexpr int32_t maxClientViewportX = 160;
static constexpr int32_t maxClientViewportY = 90;
CPU usage, which used to be around 4~6%, is now using 30%+,
If I use values like 250+ the machine crashes when opening the server.
and like 25/13 usage about 15%+
My idea was to put the enlarged view only for my game master, for my player checks.
You can set a lower value and use less CPU but I would like to try something different.
What could be causing this stress?
Maybe remove the MoveCreature since they don't need to see the gm, leaving just the CanSee?
Or does anyone know where this function call is located through the player so I can only put it if the player is gm sending the larger view?
marcelomnzs
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
- Messages
- 159
- Reaction score
- 40
So guys, can anyone help me? I want to implement it, but the calls of the creatures on the map are weighing them down, preventing a view larger than 100x100...
I tried to search the entire source code, which is why I noticed that every creature also has a range around it on the entire map during each onthink, I would like to find this specific location and keep it normal. or put the view only for the gamemaster but I still haven't been able to find how.
