[7.72] OTHire 0.0.1b - Based in OTServ Trunk (Latest)

[Nottinghster]

@Ezzz

Stopped with the project ??
Also, the exp doors aren't working well.

Example:
If I pass through the door, automatically the door must close, right ??
But the door keeps opened !!!

 

[Schmanky]

@Ezzz

Stopped with the project ??
Also, the exp doors aren't working well.

Example:
If I pass through the door, automatically the door must close, right ??
But the door keeps opened !!!

you probably don't have it set to any level, works fine for me.

 

[Nottinghster]

That's what I'm saying about the exp and quest doors

 

[Schmanky]

That's what I'm saying about the exp and quest doors

those doors aren't in 7.7, you must have added them to actions wrong. every quest door that's actually in 7.7 works fine.

 

[kubuspp]

Hello.
I have installed the latest libraries, but still I cannot handle with this error:

 

[Ganjita]

Hello.
I have installed the latest libraries, but still I cannot handle with this error:

need the libs from msvc:
http://www.microsoft.com/es-es/download/details.aspx?id=5555

 

[kubuspp]

Still doesnt work. Checked on XP and the effect is the same as on Win7...

 

[Nottinghster]

those doors aren't in 7.7, you must have added them to actions wrong. every quest door that's actually in 7.7 works fine.

Yeah, I've forgot to add those doors in movements.xml, but thanks anyway

 

[LelaStarr]

Yeah, I've forgot to add those doors in movements.xml, but thanks anyway

noob

 

[Ezzz]

noob

lmao

@Ezzz

Stopped with the project ??
Also, the exp doors aren't working well.

Example:
If I pass through the door, automatically the door must close, right ??
But the door keeps opened !!!

I'm running under Mac now, I have to setup everything up again, will also try to compile under Mac

 

[Tony32]

Really nice of you Ezzz releasing something like this. Even if it needs some work, it's still really great. And people, stop complaining about such trivial errors. Doesn't anyone on these forums know how to code even a little anymore? I mean wtf.. Some of you aren't even trying, just complaining and flaming. Be glad that he even released it.

Anyway, keep up the good work @Ezzz

Looking forward to see how good this actually can get. A little sad doh that it's not based on the latest TFS, but yeah, I know. It's a lot of work (and hard to do for that matter)

Regards,

 

[Evil Puncker]

Really nice of you Ezzz releasing something like this. Even if it needs some work, it's still really great. And people, stop complaining about such trivial errors. Doesn't anyone on these forums know how to code even a little anymore? I mean wtf.. Some of you aren't even trying, just complaining and flaming. Be glad that he even released it.

Anyway, keep up the good work @Ezzz

Looking forward to see how good this actually can get. A little sad doh that it's not based on the latest TFS, but yeah, I know. It's a lot of work (and hard to do for that matter)

Regards,

+1
if it were based on tfs 1.0 it would really rox sox

 

[Ezzz]

Really nice of you Ezzz releasing something like this. Even if it needs some work, it's still really great. And people, stop complaining about such trivial errors. Doesn't anyone on these forums know how to code even a little anymore? I mean wtf.. Some of you aren't even trying, just complaining and flaming. Be glad that he even released it.

Anyway, keep up the good work @Ezzz

Looking forward to see how good this actually can get. A little sad doh that it's not based on the latest TFS, but yeah, I know. It's a lot of work (and hard to do for that matter)

Regards,

You know I have had downgraded TFS 1.0 to 7.72, 3 times. In all I dropped the code because I "didn't know" how to fix a stack order bug, simply because TFS source is highly different from OTServ I wasn't used to it, neither to see some of the code I had in the SVN project.

+1
if it were based on tfs 1.0 it would really rox sox

If you list me why TFS is better I would do it again, in a day.

 

[Ezzz]

P.S: That bug I couldn't fix in 1.0 was easy to fix, indeed.

 

[Evil Puncker]

I can't list, but it has active development so it means that bugfixes still comes to us

 

[Ezzz]

I can't list, but it has active development so it means that bugfixes still comes to us

Not enough to convince me to do it really, OTServ stood some months without a single bug being reported.

 

[EvulMastah]

You know I have had downgraded TFS 1.0 to 7.72, 3 times. In all I dropped the code because I "didn't know" how to fix a stack order bug, simply because TFS source is highly different from OTServ I wasn't used to it, neither to see some of the code I had in the SVN project.




If you list me why TFS is better I would do it again, in a day.

Here you go, very hard to fix 'stack order bug' which just needed to change the function.
https://github.com/EvulMastah/forgottenserver/blob/master/src/tile.cpp#L1303

Id like to see you work from this place if that was the _only_ thing that kept you away

 

[Tony32]

Here you go, very hard to fix 'stack order bug' which just needed to change the function.
https://github.com/EvulMastah/forgottenserver/blob/master/src/tile.cpp#L1303

Id like to see you work from this place if that was the _only_ thing that kept you away

Maybe now we'll see an updated TFS 1.0 oldschool? Oh yes.

 

[Ezzz]

Here you go, very hard to fix 'stack order bug' which just needed to change the function.
https://github.com/EvulMastah/forgottenserver/blob/master/src/tile.cpp#L1303

Id like to see you work from this place if that was the _only_ thing that kept you away

It did kept me away 3 times, until I realized that OTServ had this as well, but I did fix it in OTServ.
In OTServ it was slightly different, the entire stack system was reversed.

 

[EvulMastah]

It is also reversed in the TFS and that is not TFS vs OTServ difference, thats how the Client handles it after some update.