- Joined
- Nov 17, 2010
- Messages
- 6,812
- Solutions
- 582
- Reaction score
- 5,372
Again, as far as cartography is concerned, or rather the critical theory of cartography, (which was the implied meaning within my sentence (thank you for being naive/ignoring my lack of pleonasm)) both yours and real tibia's maps are a joke.A
Thought the exact same way when this map was first forged From Tristrum to Crossroads Inn there's 1 lvl change and I think they are 3 and 4. For the desert however, I wanted plain plains..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartography
Saying my map is a joke "as far as cartography is concerned" is a joke. <-- Fact I'm not an educated cartographer but been making maps for 15 years + and studied geography on university level. You're allowed to have your opinion though
I am not here to discuss your logic of assuming academic cartography over critical cartography.
I am not aiming to invalidate yours, are real tibia's maps.
I am simply stating that the identifying attributes of both maps are taken for granted and/or not a plausible landmass / collection of islands.
The inconsistencies contained within both maps scream fantasy and are therefore illogical.
Posting this:
Then showing us this:What real map/piece of land/world have ever looked like this??
Is what prompted my original reply.
A small piece missing in the bottom. For reference size-wise you can find a re-modified Orc-fotress just north of the desert. The walls is barely visible. Rather big map so far and probably 90% self-made
Whether or not you believe your map to be realistic, is entirely up to you.
There is no reason to argue as my statements are only opinions based on theoretical critique.
Now sit before I get unpleasant.
Xikini