_ferrari_
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2011
- Messages
- 119
- Reaction score
- 56
You confusing things dude. You read some articles, got a grasp of some concepts but didn't understand some details.
First thing, CC is not a license, it's a organization, and they created some (not one) licenses that cover legal aspects people that want to share their work might want covered. Despite not existing anything that would make the MIT license inapplicable to images, it's mostly used for software. There is a CC license as broader as MIT, but I opted to not use it. I opted for Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0), to incentivize contribution, as people that make sprites are even more attached to their work than those who code to open source software, and would appreciate the fact that their work is being credited.
All the files that go along with the license are under it's terms, meaning all the files in the GitHub - peonso/opentibia_sprite_pack repository are under CC-BY 4.0 terms. Meaning you can do with it anything you want if you give credits and if you modified original work, state that you did.
You talked about files without licenses, under CC-SA and under CC BY-SA. That doesn't apply to anything here. Also, TFS is under GNU license (forced, since it's a branch of OTServ that also is under GNU license).
That's not related at all with what you are discussing. This means the license won't give you the right to violate "privacy" or "human rights", that sort of stuff. Some thing along the lines of "this license give you the right to do everything, but you still have to follow the laws". Example: if you want to use the sprites to kill someone, the license may not give you the necessary permission, sorry.
I thank you for explaining why you chose the license and thank you for answering the questions I'm proposing promptly. Do you honestly thiuk that the extra bureaucracy added by CC-BY 4.0 isn't a problem?
Since that is just a "maybe", could you please clarify what you mean with a quote from the document they provide as additional information to that part?
Considerations for licensors and licensees - Creative Commons
I'm not sure, these are all very convoluted topics with way too much text for me to go through. It states, though, that "other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material". What exactly they mean by this, I'm not sure.