So define minimum information needed for visitor a,b,c,d and z needed for them to take certain action . And obviously prove that (you can use math if you want to).Actually as a mathematical term it isn't. So by definition: no
You find it ignorant, but what I find ignorant is trying to devaluate informations given by person who speaks from experience perspective.That is just a wrong statement and again ignorant.
Your opinions are based on your believes. My opinions (regarding otservlist) are based on experience and all the conversations which I had with people using my service.
You are short-sighted. Adding a review system and just leaving it to people would result in a total wild-west where people would write false info about others making such reviews basically worthless.I agreed with you, you don't need to quote everything. Just leave the things out where it's unnecessary.
Reviews in systems where money is involved MUST BE moderated otherwise they bring zero value. Or even negative value when a group of people tries to destroy someone's server by writing negative comments about it.
Say that to all that multi-million companies fighting with cheaters. Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about.Then you seem to have no idea how IT works. First of all it has nothing to do with how otservlist works.
If that was so easy we wouldn't have all that intrusive anti-cheating software, we wouldn't have multi-million demonstrative legal cases against people creating cheating software for games et cetera.
It's all about the source verification so obviously it has a lot to do with otservlist since it relies on info given by servers. Of course we try to verify infos (to some degree), otherwise there wouldn't be a single banned server, right?
And each such banishment moves a bar higher to a point where I need to be way more intrusive to prove cheating. This is a constant war-race which takes most of my time (related to otservlist).
Those 2 things doesn't even barely solve a problem of information verification. I'm sorry mate but you clearly fall into dunning-kruger effect.But those are just 2 things
Once again I value your opinion but I'm not going to change how otservlist works because a minority asks me to do that. I can however add features which benefits all the groups.And just because the minority says something, doesn't mean the majority wouldn't welcome a change.
Henry Ford once said: “If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”
Post automatically merged:
Oh mr. Lima aka Titanico I'm SO GLAD that you have posted here.that's right there is no way to convince this xin, unjustly banned me I had to close my server.
I don't know if I'm happy or sad to have the same people suffering the same problem that I had, a warning to you, it doesn't matter, if he thought you were like that then you are like that and he was already your server and you together.
for sure my server was a job and you took it from me, i hate you to this day.
Yepp, you fit well into one of the groups which I've been talking about. And here is the output of one of your servers (dragoglobal.servegame.com), where we can clearly see that the graph represents a constant growth which means that you counted xlogged characters.
Or maybe I should remind you how you thought that you can harm me by sending messages to KNF (polish money institution) regarding me?
Or maybe when you wrote "remember it was your choice" and started ddosing otservlist?
OR maybe you want to talk about your "drugovich-global.com" server where you counted xlogged characters (and even Mark messaged me about that and asked to check that?):
That's the people which I've been talking about Here is the live example.