@Peonso
I agree, this discussion has been over for a few posts now. The other guy is just insulting people rather than actually discussing anything and you are starting to stonewall any point made by simply saying it's wrong without providing anything of substance other than the fact that you think we are "delusional".
You need to check yourself in the mirror sometime boi.
Or you can keep on disagreeing with everybody until you actually Hit a stonewall, being an imbecile one-directional driver, whatever your preference.
@e.e
Man it's not like I reported anything invalid. Someone checked my server and banned me. The players were there. It was only like 10 people!
And I need to do custom source edits to make it not report players "afk" to the otservlist right? It's been a while since I left.
Depends on how you define invalid.
If one server has no-logout zones on 90% of the map, keeping players on indefinitely after exiting the client, and then all of these players are reported to otservlist as online, is the report invalid?
Is it invalid if a server has INF afk time and all players, including players who's been afk for 26 days in a row now, are reported as online to otservlist?
Is it invalid if a server reports 612 MC'd characters from one IP all as online?
Is your answer really gonna be "nope, only if the server adds numbers of players that are not at all online to the report"?
Like I've already told the both of you that I (completely) understand your feeling of outrage, that otservlist still have things to work on, and that I approve of the creative search for new options and possibilities, but you both need a healthy dose of realism as well that seems to be sorely lacking.
You know, a wake-up call, a splash or slap to the face, etc, 'cus right now it's clear that you basically only see your own perspectives without any regard of anyone else's.
At least imo.