Terotrificy
Veteran OT User
Since when do I need to work at CipSoft to make this argument? jesus christ.You've got a lot of statements here, did you work at Cipsoft or how do you have this information? Or are these statements coming from your personal feelings?
There is nothing wrong with using Blizzard as an example because it's a perfect example to use especially since I have facts to back it up. Why would I need to change to different examples when it perfectly highlights the issue with going after private servers?
I also used Hollywood as an example, why didn't you mention it? Like is it too much for your brain to handle?
My position is not based on insider information or personal feelings, but on something much simpler: the complete absence of evidence.
There is no public record, no lawsuit, no cease-and-desist campaign, no court filing, and no documented legal action showing CipSoft actively defending its intellectual property against small or medium OT servers for almost 20 years.
When someone claims that a company does enforce its IP, the burden of proof is on that claim, not on the person pointing out that no such evidence exists. Do I have to teach it to you too?
This is precisely why the Blizzard comparison is brainless. Blizzard demonstrably tries: legal actions, takedowns, court cases, etc. Whether they always succeed is a different topic.
CipSoft’s case is different not because enforcement is hard but because there is no evidence of any attempt at all. They didn't even made his 2007 leak public to this date, they just reverted the game world state back to some days and that was it.
Do you want to keep embarrasing yourself? I can go all day.
As for your Hollywood example, it's up to a comparisson for Blizzard, not for Cipsoft, since Cipsoft never really tried.

