LOL, "pull it" meant to pull the firefighters out of the building. "Pull it" is not a demolition term, talk to any demolition expert or engineer, secondly the owner of the building was IN NO POSITION OF AUTHORITY to order the fire department to destroy a building like that which held countless government and civilian documents and archives. Yes yes you go to a university, not sure if that's true but frankly it doesn't matter. You lack common sense and comprehension...it's not hard to do good in school, it's not hard and it doesn't take a genius to get good grades. Sadly I see you've simply read propaganda which is untrue, and since you are Chilean I expect you have a harder time trying to find facts...because these conspiracies are just speculation, frankly they don't even deserve to be called that because not only have they not been proven and there is no evidence to support these claims, the claims have been DISPROVED by scientists, structural engineers, mathematicians, physicists, you name it. Yes the original report classified it as unknown because at that time IT WAS UNKNOWN, and you call yourself a university student? The government isn't some kind of super computer or robot that it comes up with answers for everything at a moment's notice, it takes years of investigation and gathering evidence to officially classify something as the cause of a catastrophe in a commission report, they don't just officially classify theories.
The owner asked for it to be demolished? Firstly, he denied ever saying to demolish the building, by "pull it" he meant to pull the firefighters out, secondly "pull it" is not and never was a demolition term, ask ANY DEMOLITION EXPERT, thirdly the owner of the building did not have any kind of authority, let alone the kind necessary to order the demolition of such an important building, fourthly you are implying that he decided to demolish it on the spot, which is foolish since it would take weeks of to wire and plan WTC7's demolition, and once again there were no demolition tools, det cord, bomb residue, or bomb material found at ANY of the sites, so look's like it is your "stupid wack argument" that fails you silly boy.
The attacks were investigated by multiple teams and HUNDREDS of researchers, they belonged to the government, agencies, and various top universities, so they did not all work for the US government. Yet, when their math is investigated and tested by hundreds of other scientists AROUND THE WORLD, they are found to be correct and they all come to the same conclusion, that statements goes to Detdu as well.
@Detdu
If you're going to respond to everything with "that's what the government says", then there is no point in discussing anything with you. If the government is really so bad then all of you conspiracy theorists would be rotting in a jail cell somewhere, you have no idea what a truly corrupt and oppressive government is. How about you learn to think for yourself instead of believing everything you are "spoon fed" by a bunch of college kids who failed at film career and have no knowledge in physics or structural engineering? Once again, hundreds of independent researchers and scientists have all come to the same conclusion, many from were around the world.
@ Jew
He get his evidence from "Loose Change" and all of this other youtube video BS. I've seen it, and 90% of the quotes in there were taken out of context and were cut off short before another part came that contradicted conspiracy theories. He simply has no life and feels that everything the government does and says is actually some diabolical plot to kill it's own civilians, demolish it's cities and infrastructure, and make a hell hole out of their country, yet we are still alive and well, and people have been living well and not being slaughtered by their government(in the US) for hundreds of years. Like he said, he said he doesn't need facts, instead he believes whatever stupid thoughts come to his foolish and simple mind.
