- Joined
- Dec 30, 2007
- Messages
- 529
- Solutions
- 5
- Reaction score
- 191
Give me names of at least 10 major ecologists and give me their research papers, which are broad studies of global warming effect and which provide all major factors involved in that effect with pointing out major role of human's heavy industry.
Dude… Patents can be used until there isn’t any law that specifically bans technique, process, activity, etc. patented in that application. And the content of application itself is kept secret from the moment of applying until patent office approves it. Lobbies doesn’t have any access to the content to be even able to ban it or something.
Do you even know how law works…?
Your cat/dog eats food, shits shit and uses oxygen/emits carbon dioxide. For nature/environment it is much more hard to replenish / get rid of, than some amount of carbon dioxide from that Mustang car xD
Car requires only small piece of land with plants. Any animals, especially carnivores, requires piece of land to grow food for other animals which will later be “convert” into food for your animal, piece of land to keep that animal-food, piece of land to convert waste and CO2 emitted by that animal-food, piece of land to keep your animal, piece of land to converst CO2 and shit produced by you animal, etc.
If you want to talk about global warming in scientific tone of facts, then operate on real scientific arguments like bibliography of research papers, not on some document with oscar-winning-actor-wannabe. This is the same as trying to get any scientific facts out of The Bing Bang theory… xD Like seriously. Be adult about it.
They are the biggest or the second economy after China (it depends on economist’s view), so expecting from them to produce less waste is either naïve or borderline retarded.
France is full of radical Muslims who reproduce 10x faster than native French people and they will take over country within few generation, so looking at that Marxists/politically correct idiots in French elites is very stupid idea
Because your country is too poor to invest in development of biopolymers which could be produced in big tanks of bacteria batches xD
And they don’t give a damn, use cheap plastic and invest money too later get more green of efficient sources of biodegradable plastics.
Wut…? My examples of poor countries was part of topic in regard to happiness of Dutch people who have money to invest in socialistic experiments and about socialism not working in rebuilding/young States. It had nothing to do waste production, so I don’t understand why the hell you connected those parts.
So basically you wanna tell:
- generating green energy is useless
- using electric or cars with less consumption is useless
- stop using brown coal is useless
And everyone should become vegeterian and that will solve global warming problem.
You basically failed to accept fact that US is the biggest poluter in the world (if you count CO2 produced per citizen) and after that I am not able to more speak with you.